Serveur d'exploration sur Monteverdi

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

‘High’ clefs in composition and performance

Identifieur interne : 000381 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000380; suivant : 000382

‘High’ clefs in composition and performance

Auteurs : Andrew Johnstone

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:6B6656293CF12B35DE1A6D74FF357C9AEA7727B3

English descriptors

Abstract

Modern musicians have treated ‘high’-clef notation like a dead language that has to be translated into their vernacular. In the 19th century the translation was achieved by substituting clefs and signatures, creating the false impression that ‘high’ clefs implied transposition by a 3rd. In the 20th century it was achieved by universally adopting an easy-to-read vocal-score format that obliterated essential characteristics of the original clef-combinations. Hermelink tried to bring those characteristics back to the fore, but posited a false origin (the ten-line staff) for the normal and ‘high’ standard clef-combinations that attached more discrete meanings to them than they ever really had. They seem instead to be a product of imitative counterpoint, which necessitated a uniform configuration of the vocal ensemble, and modal factors, which necessitated transpositions that could be either committed to the page or entrusted to the performers. Normal-clef concordances of ‘high’-clef works show how the ‘high’ clefs were interpreted in practice, and accord with the edicts of later theorists. ‘High’-clef bass parts were frequently set a 3rd, rather than a 5th, below the tenor to facilitate transpositions that yielded lower tenor, alto and soprano parts than those yielded by the normal clefs. The late Renaissance habit of using of high-looking notation for low-sounding music is counterintuitive (and somehow harder to accept than the no less anomalous later habit of using of short note-values for adagios and longer ones for allegros). But ‘high’ notation was a vestige of the time when composers dealt with relative rather than absolute pitches, and the gradual consolidation of pitch standards caused it to become associated with specific rules of transposition. In this context, the low effect of the so-called ‘high’ clefs makes sense.

Url:
DOI: 10.1093/em/cah190


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">‘High’ clefs in composition and performance</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Johnstone, Andrew" sort="Johnstone, Andrew" uniqKey="Johnstone A" first="Andrew" last="Johnstone">Andrew Johnstone</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6B6656293CF12B35DE1A6D74FF357C9AEA7727B3</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/em/cah190</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6B6656293CF12B35DE1A6D74FF357C9AEA7727B3/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000098</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000084</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000349</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0306-1078:2006:Johnstone A:high:clefs:in</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000400</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000398</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000381</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">‘High’ clefs in composition and performance</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Johnstone, Andrew" sort="Johnstone, Andrew" uniqKey="Johnstone A" first="Andrew" last="Johnstone">Andrew Johnstone</name>
<affiliation>
<wicri:noCountry code="subField">Dublin. He is working on a book about modes and vocal scoring in the Renaissance and Baroque periods.</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Early Music</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Early Music</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-1078</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1741-7260</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2006-02">2006-02</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">34</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="29">29</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="54">54</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-1078</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">6B6656293CF12B35DE1A6D74FF357C9AEA7727B3</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/em/cah190</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0306-1078</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Renaissance music</term>
<term>high clefs</term>
<term>notation</term>
<term>pitch</term>
<term>transposition</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Modern musicians have treated ‘high’-clef notation like a dead language that has to be translated into their vernacular. In the 19th century the translation was achieved by substituting clefs and signatures, creating the false impression that ‘high’ clefs implied transposition by a 3rd. In the 20th century it was achieved by universally adopting an easy-to-read vocal-score format that obliterated essential characteristics of the original clef-combinations. Hermelink tried to bring those characteristics back to the fore, but posited a false origin (the ten-line staff) for the normal and ‘high’ standard clef-combinations that attached more discrete meanings to them than they ever really had. They seem instead to be a product of imitative counterpoint, which necessitated a uniform configuration of the vocal ensemble, and modal factors, which necessitated transpositions that could be either committed to the page or entrusted to the performers. Normal-clef concordances of ‘high’-clef works show how the ‘high’ clefs were interpreted in practice, and accord with the edicts of later theorists. ‘High’-clef bass parts were frequently set a 3rd, rather than a 5th, below the tenor to facilitate transpositions that yielded lower tenor, alto and soprano parts than those yielded by the normal clefs. The late Renaissance habit of using of high-looking notation for low-sounding music is counterintuitive (and somehow harder to accept than the no less anomalous later habit of using of short note-values for adagios and longer ones for allegros). But ‘high’ notation was a vestige of the time when composers dealt with relative rather than absolute pitches, and the gradual consolidation of pitch standards caused it to become associated with specific rules of transposition. In this context, the low effect of the so-called ‘high’ clefs makes sense.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Johnstone, Andrew" sort="Johnstone, Andrew" uniqKey="Johnstone A" first="Andrew" last="Johnstone">Andrew Johnstone</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Musique/explor/MonteverdiV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000381 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000381 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Musique
   |area=    MonteverdiV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:6B6656293CF12B35DE1A6D74FF357C9AEA7727B3
   |texte=   ‘High’ clefs in composition and performance
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21.
Data generation: Mon May 9 21:59:15 2016. Site generation: Mon Feb 12 09:57:54 2024